![]() You should then be able to select the Chromecast Audio created DLNA renderer as an Audio Device in Audirvana's Audio System tab, which will get Audirvana to stream its audio output over the network to the Chromecast Audio via the BubbleUPnP Server.Īudirvana sends its audio output from playing FLAC files in the playlist, to the selected UPnP/DLNA streamer, as losslessly uncompressed PCM streams (contained in WAV files). Having said that, you can use the BubbleUPnP Server helper application to create a DLNA renderer for your Chromecast Audio, to bridge the incompatible UPnP/DLNA and Google Cast streaming technologies:ĭocs/Config Media Renderers.md | BubbleUPnP Server The only network audio streaming technologies that Audirvana supports are industry standard UPnP/DLNA and Apple's AirPlay.Ĭhromecast devices are not UPnP/DLNA streamers (just in case that was the reason why you thought you could use your Chromecast Audio with Audirvana) - it's a common misconception! Now I couldn’t tell them apart.Audirvana does not support the Google Cast network streaming technology, used by Chromecast devices. In my case, I asked my wife to play a short fragment on one player and then the same fragment on the other player. In other words, a unsighted test so you have to assess sound quality by ear and not by sight. The obvious answer is a experimental design eliminating our bias. We know that our judgement (perception) is a psychological process. I checked all the settings, both WASAPI/Exclusive, no DSP, volume 100%, etc.Īlthough I heard this myself, this of course cannot be true, if both send the same file unaltered to a DAC, it must sound the same. ![]() Obvious JRiver sounds fuller/darker and Musicbee lighter and more transparent. I played a track in JRiver, then the same track in Musicbee. This reminds of the time I was comparing JRiver and Muiscbee for sound quality. Hope that this will be investigated and improved I am not so sure why this is happening since WASAPI(exclusive) is bit-perfect and no processing should be done and sent directly to the DAC.īut I guess one possibility might be due to software volume adjusting, and I find that enabling logarithmic volumes scaling seems to improve a little bit (not so much though)Īnother larger possibility might be due to the resampling method, since resampling is unavoidable for sending the sampling rate that my DAC is accepting. ![]() I really love MB's UI, and it's the only one fulfilling my requirement, so would like to ask if there will be any change in the future. One of the best audio quality I've tried is audirvana,Īnd for strawberry music player, it also provides a exceptional "clear" music but retaining a good qualityįor dopamine player, even though it is only using WASAPI in shared mode, I do think it is still quite better than MB in exclusive mode. ![]() Using the latest version, all settings that might alter sound quality such as fading/EQ/DSP are disable, and WASAPI shared/exclusive for output module. The music is clear, but that's it, feeling it too "thin", losing a lots of dynamic, details etc. However, while I found that some people claimed that Musicbee is also one of the "best sound quality" music player, I found that it is not the case when having experiences with many different players, and honestly speaking I think most of the others are doing a better job including VLC (of coz changing all setting to best audio quality). In terms of UI, Musicbee is literally the best one, and the only one showing the tags correctly, displaying large and clear album art without badly compressing it. Then I tried to find an "audiophile" alternative with good UI with great handling for displaying album art. I have been using VLC as my music player for quite a long time, but I really hate the way it handles album art (files with long album name will fail to create folder in AppData thus nothing to display)
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |